Vertical Exaggeration

gnasche · 09-19-2004, 12:48 AM

What is the most proportionate "vertical exaggeration"? It seems to be either 2 or 3, but I'm just guessing.

cmaxwell · 09-19-2004, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gnasche@Sep 18 2004, 03:48 PM
What is the most proportionate "vertical exaggeration"? It seems to be either 2 or 3, but I'm just guessing.

Quoted post

Although it seems that 2 or 3 should be the "correct" vertical exaggeration, "1" is the correct and real vertical exaggeration. More correctly, "1" means that the vertical height is multiplied by 1.0, whereas vertical exaggeration of 3 means that vertical height is multiplied by 3.0.

We should probably make that clearer in our documentation.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Real time GPS tracking	javier.santoro	Add-ons & Scripts	221	02-13-2010 02:00 PM
Vertical exageration	Thunderchild	Technical Support	1	08-28-2005 02:00 PM
height (vertical) 3d rendering	Guest_Daniel_*	WorldWind General	4	02-22-2005 01:33 PM
Vertical exaggeration	Mark	WorldWind General	2	02-14-2005 09:38 PM
Unofficial FAQ	Llynix	WorldWind General	12	09-27-2004 01:14 AM

09-19-2004, 12:48 AM	#1
gnasche Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 2	What is the most proportionate "vertical exaggeration"? It seems to be either 2 or 3, but I'm just guessing.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)