ww 1.4 source code - - WHERE IS IT?? - Page 2

01-27-2010, 03:20 AM

Wow. What a bummer that there isn't a downloadable build. Everything is disjointed and falling apart. NASA has a java SDK. big whoop for anyone who doesn't need or know how to use an SDK.

Nothing 'out there' shows off any of the hard work done in either java or .Net

Just sad.

Folks you were all ahead of your time.

This could still be a combination of what everyone out there want to use for a lot of important applications.

I'm still plugging away as I can, but .. family.. whither have you gone?

nlneilson · 01-27-2010, 07:21 PM

It's interesting this thread comes up again, I had a problem even finding the SVN address.

Nearly all of the WW "family" has moved to the Java version.

James_In_Utah · 01-28-2010, 08:26 PM

I wish they would just build and release the latest code and call it V1.4.1 and be done with it. It's better than V1.4.

Ganbayar · 02-28-2010, 04:30 PM

but 1.4.1 has some bugs

Ganbayar · 02-28-2010, 04:32 PM

why WW developing process is too slow?

m_k · 02-28-2010, 06:14 PM

Because there are no developers?

Ganbayar · 03-01-2010, 12:28 PM

java version have more developers?

m_k · 03-01-2010, 03:54 PM

Yes. They also have funding ($$$).

WW.Net has no money, so there are no full-time developers. And even if there are some people interested in .Net then it's not so easy for them to "jump" into the code without proper documentation or other devs.

Ganbayar · 03-01-2010, 05:25 PM

why java version has not friendly user interface?
i don't understand how to use in personal.

nlneilson · 03-01-2010, 06:23 PM

WW.net and WWJ are powerful tools. They take time to learn.

Games are designed to be user friendly.

01-27-2010, 03:20 AM	#11
omdesign Guest Posts: n/a	Drying on the vine? Wow. What a bummer that there isn't a downloadable build. Everything is disjointed and falling apart. NASA has a java SDK. big whoop for anyone who doesn't need or know how to use an SDK. Nothing 'out there' shows off any of the hard work done in either java or .Net Just sad. Folks you were all ahead of your time. This could still be a combination of what everyone out there want to use for a lot of important applications. I'm still plugging away as I can, but .. family.. whither have you gone?

02-28-2010, 06:14 PM	#16
m_k Bored Explorer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Warsaw, Poland Posts: 1,738	Because there are no developers? __________________ Hot stuff: FAQ, forum search, DirectX, .NET, Video Card Compatibility list

03-01-2010, 03:54 PM	#18
m_k Bored Explorer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Warsaw, Poland Posts: 1,738	Yes. They also have funding ($$$). WW.Net has no money, so there are no full-time developers. And even if there are some people interested in .Net then it's not so easy for them to "jump" into the code without proper documentation or other devs. __________________ Hot stuff: FAQ, forum search, DirectX, .NET, Video Card Compatibility list

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Source code	Unregistered	Developers' Corner	3	11-20-2006 05:54 PM
DStile Source Code	adamhill	Image Serving & GIS	4	06-07-2006 05:26 AM
DStile Source Code	adamhill	Developers' Corner	7	03-13-2006 02:40 AM
Discussion on some features of WW source code	ivr	Developers' Corner	2	05-13-2005 06:34 PM
Can't connect to servers	hroo772	Technical Support	11	02-12-2005 02:19 AM

01-27-2010, 07:21 PM	#12
nlneilson Super Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 35.0376,-117.9688 Posts: 1,519	It's interesting this thread comes up again, I had a problem even finding the SVN address. Nearly all of the WW "family" has moved to the Java version.

01-28-2010, 08:26 PM	#13
James_In_Utah Super Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Eden, Utah Posts: 1,446	I wish they would just build and release the latest code and call it V1.4.1 and be done with it. It's better than V1.4.

02-28-2010, 04:30 PM	#14
Ganbayar Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 82	but 1.4.1 has some bugs

02-28-2010, 04:32 PM	#15
Ganbayar Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 82	why WW developing process is too slow?

03-01-2010, 12:28 PM	#17
Ganbayar Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 82	java version have more developers?

03-01-2010, 05:25 PM	#19
Ganbayar Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 82	why java version has not friendly user interface? i don't understand how to use in personal.

03-01-2010, 06:23 PM	#20
nlneilson Super Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: 35.0376,-117.9688 Posts: 1,519	WW.net and WWJ are powerful tools. They take time to learn. Games are designed to be user friendly.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)